Rules-based OASIS-E2 QA

OASIS review that shows its work.

MsJaneHH checks home-health OASIS-E2 assessments against deterministic CMS rules — and shows the exact guidance reference behind every flag. Instant, transparent, and private to your agency. No AI guessing, no data pooling.

Readiness check 2 flagged · 1 ready
M1830 · Bathing  /  M1860 · Ambulation

Bedfast (M1860 = 05) is inconsistent with independent bathing (M1830 = 00).

OASIS-E2 Guidance Manual · Ch. 3 §G Functional Status
M1021 · Primary diagnosis

Primary diagnosis is required and cannot be a V, W, X, Y, or E code.

OASIS-E2 Guidance Manual · Ch. 3 §I Active Diagnoses
M0090 · Date assessment completed

Present and consistent with the start-of-care date.

ruleset oasis-e2-v2026.04.01 ready to export when clear

From assessment to submission-ready

Four steps. Every flag is traceable; nothing is auto-answered for the clinician.

01

Guided assessment

The clinician answers OASIS-E2 items one at a time, with skip logic so only relevant items appear.

02

Validation with citations

Deterministic CMS edit checks run instantly and flag issues — each with the specific guidance reference behind it.

03

Correction & QA sign-off

A reviewer assigns each flag back to the clinician. Once corrected, MsJaneHH re-checks the fix itself before the reviewer gives final sign-off — closure isn't just taken on someone's word.

04

Export, gated on real errors

Once every flagged error is resolved, export the CMS-shaped file. If hard errors are still open, export stays blocked — automatically, not by policy.

Every rule cites a CMS reference.
Guidance Manual, effective 2026-04-01 · Data Specs V3.02.0
404 real OASIS-E2 item codes.
generated from CMS's own data dictionary →
Versioned and dated.
ruleset oasis-e2-v2026.04.01

The four things that actually get claims denied

Industry denial-trigger reporting for 2025–2026 names four recurring causes: late or missing Notices of Admission, face-to-face certification errors, insufficient medical necessity evidence, and OASIS/PDGM mismatches. That's not a loose theme — it's close to a checklist, and it's what MsJaneHH is built to catch.

$600+ per episode

The financial gap between adjacent PDGM payment groups when a functional or clinical grouping score is off by one level. Across a 100-patient census, that's a five- or six-figure swing in a year.

7.7% improper payment rate

CMS's own Comprehensive Error Rate Testing program found this rate on home health claims nationally — roughly $1.2 billion in payment inaccuracies in a single year.

1 in 13 episodes hits LUPA

The national average LUPA rate runs 7.6–9.79% depending on the data cut — a full case-rate payment quietly becoming a much smaller per-visit one.

Sources: CMS Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) program data; McBee Associates analysis of CMS claims data; industry PDGM billing and denial-trigger reporting, 2025–2026. Figures are industry averages, not a guarantee for any specific agency.

See what affects payment before you submit

Some OASIS items feed directly into PDGM case-mix scoring. MsJaneHH flags the ones worth a second look — not to maximize payment, but so the record is complete, consistent, and supportable before it goes out the door.

NOA timing

Flags admissions approaching the 5-day Notice of Admission filing deadline while there's still time to file, not after the payment is already lost.

LUPA risk

Flags episodes on pace to fall under the visit-count threshold for their HHRG while there's still time to adjust the visit plan.

Classification accuracy

Recalculates admission source and episode timing from claims history and flags any mismatch against what was submitted — before it affects your case-mix weight.

Now building: risk adjustment that protects payment and quality scores

A single missed comorbidity or off-by-one functional score doesn't just cost money today — it sets the baseline CMS uses to risk-adjust your public quality measures and Star Rating tomorrow. Under-documented complexity means lower reimbursement and a quality score that looks worse than your actual care. The risk adjustment suite — in development — flags both sides of that gap before submission.

See how it works

Now building: what happens after a denial

QA catches problems before submission. The rev cycle module — in development — picks up what still gets denied: matching denial codes to CMS rules, drafting appeals from documented fact, and tracking every deadline.

See how it works

Pricing you can read before you call

Unlike enterprise EHR platforms with custom quotes, our tiers are public — from a low-cost pilot to multi-agency consultant plans.

See pricing

Bring transparent OASIS QA to your agency

We're onboarding pilot agencies and consultants now.

Request pilot access